Sunday August 23, 2026
Place your advertisement here.
Contact us today +2207336467/5035263
.
GCRPS Logo
Place your advertisement here.
Contact us today +2207336467/5035263
GRA Image
Place your advertisement here.
Contact us today +2207336467/5035263

Audit Shows Over D1 Million Was Diverted From EFSTH Into Dr. Jagne’s Personal Bank Account

A NAO audit finds 1.3 million dalasis misdirected to Dr. Jagne, 5 million in questionable worker payments, and 600,000 dalasis to an absent staffer at EFSTH, highlighting urgent need for better financial controls.

Share the news with your Friends and Family
Gambia-NAO-audit-EFSTH-misallocated-funds

A special audit conducted by the National Audit Office has uncovered that over 1.3 million dalasis allocated for a Medical Research Council project were improperly transferred to Dr. Jagne’s account, with no supporting evidence for their use.

Furthermore, more than 5 million dalasis were identified in questionable payments made to casual workers, prompting EFSTH management to verify the identities of these workers.

Staff member Patrick Idoko received upwards of 600,000 dalasis without attending work; although the funds have been returned, auditors have recommended that he be suspended.

EFSTH management reported submitting some receipts and outlined plans to authenticate the workers while addressing Idoko’s circumstances and the repayment agreement.

The audits underscore the necessity for enhanced oversight and internal controls within Gambia’s health sector.

Sign up to receive the latest news and events in your inbox

Join our community of news enthusiasts.

Breaking News in your inbox

Sign up to receive latest news and events in your inbox.

Share the news with your Friends and Family

Related News

Gambian-lawmaker-file-case-supreme-court-FGM-ban

Gambian Lawmaker, Seven Others File Case in Supreme Court Over Upholding on FGM Ban

A group led by National Assembly member Almamy Gibba is challenging the legality of female circumcision in The Gambia. They have filed a case at the Supreme Court arguing that the laws criminalizing the practice violate the country’s constitution. The group contends that these laws infringe upon religious and cultural rights, particularly those of Muslim women. They seek to overturn the specific amendments that outlawed female circumcision.

Share the news with your Friends and Family
ARPS Media
ARPS Media

FREE
VIEW